Larne vs Linfield Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Larne vs Linfield: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Larne
Home Team
Linfield
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Larne
Draw
Linfield
Statistical Comparison
4W, 3D, 3L
5W, 1D, 4L
14 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
+2
+4
6 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
3W / 7 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 67.4
League Difficulty: 50.1, Opponent Quality: 54.4
1W / 4 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.08
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.03
Attack: 51.5, Defense: 66.2, Form: 44.2
Attack: 50.5, Defense: 50.5, Form: 44.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Larne
Linfield
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Context matters here: Larne's schedule strength (SoS: 60.4) has been notably more demanding than Linfield's (SoS: 39.1), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Offensively, Linfield outperforms Larne with 1.7 goals per match to 1.4, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Larne giving up 1.2 and Linfield giving up 1.3 per fixture.
Larne has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Linfield is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Larne has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📈 Form Momentum: Linfield has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for Larne. In practical terms, Larne would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
Larne has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.8-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Larne
Linfield
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Larne
4W 3D 3L · 14 goals scored · 12 conceded
Linfield
5W 1D 4L · 17 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams