Skip to content
Compare Macclesfield vs Bedford

Macclesfield vs Bedford Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Macclesfield vs Bedford: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Macclesfield Macclesfield Home Team
Bedford Bedford Away Team
Macclesfield
37.0
W D D L W L W L L W

Last 10 Matches

Bedford
43.4
W D D D W W D L W L

Performance Radar

Macclesfield
Bedford

Categories Won

6

Macclesfield

3

Draw

6

Bedford

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Kay (2 goals)
G. Moncur (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
29%

2W / 7 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
29.7

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.3

37.1

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.59

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01

1.13

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
37.0

Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9

43.4

Attack: 37.7, Defense: 52.3, Form: 34.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

2
Macclesfield
Bedford
Macclesfield

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 42.5
Defense 31.9
Form 31.9
Consistency 44.8
Bedford

Power Rating Breakdown

43.4

Overall

Attack 37.7
Defense 52.3
Form 34.8
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

34.5 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

45.3 vs 40.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Macclesfield logo Macclesfield
W
Altrincham (48%)
D
Warrington (44%)
D
Leek (47%)
L
Kidderminster (72%)
W
Chester (46%)
L
Radcliffe (30%)
W
Southport (44%)
L
Spennymoor (40%)
Bedford logo Bedford
W
Walton & H (46%)
D
Scarborough (40%)
D
South Shields (47%)
D
Hereford (40%)
W
King's Lynn (40%)
W
Leamington (26%)
D
Telford (39%)
L
Buxton (60%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Altrincham A
5 - 2 W
48%
Warrington A
2 - 2 D
44%
Leek A
1 - 1 D
47%
Kidderminster A
1 - 3 L
72%
Chester H
2 - 1 W
46%
Radcliffe A
0 - 1 L
30%
Southport H
2 - 1 W
44%
Spennymoor H
0 - 2 L
40%
South Shields A
1 - 4 L
47%
Merthyr A
2 - 1 W
35%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Walton & H H
2 - 0 W
46%
Scarborough H
1 - 1 D
40%
South Shields A
1 - 1 D
47%
Hereford H
2 - 2 D
40%
King's Lynn A
1 - 0 W
40%
Leamington H
3 - 1 W
26%
Telford A
2 - 2 D
39%
Buxton A
0 - 3 L
60%
Radcliffe H
1 - 0 W
25%
Worksop H
0 - 2 L
46%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 29.7 vs 37.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Offensively, Macclesfield outperforms Bedford with 1.6 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Bedford's backline outperforms Macclesfield's, with 1.2 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.

Bedford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Bedford has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for Bedford. In practical terms, Bedford would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Bedford, with a 6.4-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Macclesfield

Macclesfield

VS
Bedford

Bedford

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Macclesfield

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded

Bedford

4W 4D 2L · 13 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or