Macclesfield vs Bedford Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Macclesfield vs Bedford: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Macclesfield
Home Team
Bedford
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Macclesfield
Draw
Bedford
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
4W, 4D, 2L
16 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
-2
+1
0 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
3W / 6 matches
2W / 7 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.3
League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.9
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.17
Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9
Attack: 37.7, Defense: 52.3, Form: 34.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Macclesfield
Bedford
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 29.7 vs 37.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Offensively, Macclesfield outperforms Bedford with 1.6 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Bedford's backline outperforms Macclesfield's, with 1.2 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.
Bedford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Bedford has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 6.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for Bedford. In practical terms, Bedford would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Bedford, with a 6.4-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Macclesfield
Bedford
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Macclesfield
4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded
Bedford
4W 4D 2L · 13 goals scored · 12 conceded
Popular Teams