Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Epitsentr

NAC vs Epitsentr Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Epitsentr: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Epitsentr Epitsentr Away Team
NAC
31.9
D W L L D D L L D L

Last 10 Matches

Epitsentr
49.6
D D W D D D D L W L

Performance Radar

NAC
Epitsentr

Categories Won

1

NAC

2

Draw

12

Epitsentr

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

20%

2W, 6D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

0

0

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Soumano (2 goals)
V. Sydun (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.3

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.8

67.8

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 67.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

1.46

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.26

Adjusted Power Rating
31.9

Attack: 34.8, Defense: 27.8, Form: 10.4

49.6

Attack: 47.1, Defense: 70.7, Form: 23.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

5
4

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

1
NAC
Epitsentr
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.8
Defense 27.8
Form 10.4
Consistency 75.7
Epitsentr

Power Rating Breakdown

49.6

Overall

Attack 47.1
Defense 70.7
Form 23.6
Consistency 71.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

63.8 vs 67.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 20%
NAC logo NAC
D
AZ (68%)
W
Heerenveen (65%)
L
Utrecht (77%)
L
Ajax (68%)
D
Fortuna (56%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (56%)
L
Go Ahead (64%)
Epitsentr logo Epitsentr
D
SK Poltava (49%)
D
Metalist 1925 (80%)
W
Polissya (79%)
D
Obolon (61%)
D
Veres Rivne (64%)
D
Oleksandria (52%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (77%)
L
Zorya (79%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ A
3 - 3 D
68%
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
65%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
77%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
68%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
56%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
56%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
64%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
73%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SK Poltava H
0 - 0 D
49%
Metalist 1925 A
1 - 1 D
80%
Polissya H
3 - 2 W
79%
Obolon A
2 - 2 D
61%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 3 D
64%
Oleksandria H
1 - 1 D
52%
Karpaty Lviv H
0 - 0 D
77%
Zorya A
0 - 1 L
79%
Kudrivka H
1 - 0 W
55%
Kryvbas KR A
1 - 2 L
77%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Epitsentr has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.8) compared to NAC (SoS: 54.3). This means Epitsentr's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with NAC averaging 1.0 and Epitsentr averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Defensively, Epitsentr is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while NAC leaks 2.2 per match.

Epitsentr has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Epitsentr emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (49.6 vs 31.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Epitsentr

Epitsentr

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

NAC

1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 22 conceded

Epitsentr

2W 6D 2L · 12 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or