Skip to content
Compare Penybont vs TNS

Penybont vs TNS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Penybont vs TNS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Penybont Penybont Home Team
TNS TNS Away Team
Penybont
30.3
L L W D L L D L L L

Last 10 Matches

TNS
44.6
L L L W W W L W W L

Performance Radar

Penybont
TNS

Categories Won

1

Penybont

2

Draw

12

TNS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 2D, 7L

50%

5W, 0D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.4

4 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-9

-9

0

0

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Venables (2 goals)
R. Brobbel (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.4

League Difficulty: 51.6, Opponent Quality: 56.4

44.6

League Difficulty: 58.7, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.39

Actual: 0.4 | Diff: +0.01

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
30.3

Attack: 12.1, Defense: 51.2, Form: 9.0

44.6

Attack: 37.8, Defense: 56.8, Form: 47.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1

31-45'

1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

6
Penybont
TNS
Penybont

Power Rating Breakdown

30.3

Overall

Attack 12.1
Defense 51.2
Form 9.0
Consistency 74.5
TNS

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 37.8
Defense 56.8
Form 47.3
Consistency 32.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

51.6 vs 58.7

Opponent Quality

56.4 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Penybont logo Penybont
L
FC St. Coloma (76%)
L
FC St. Coloma (75%)
W
Haverfordwest (55%)
D
Colwyn Bay (52%)
L
Caernarfon (48%)
L
Barry Town (56%)
D
Colwyn Bay (48%)
L
Connah's Quay Nomads (47%)
TNS logo TNS
L
Flora (74%)
L
Sabah (95%)
L
Sabah (97%)
W
Barry Town (61%)
W
Connah's Quay Nomads (42%)
W
Caernarfon (48%)
L
Colwyn Bay (48%)
W
Penybont (36%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
FC St. Coloma A
0 - 3 L
76%
FC St. Coloma H
0 - 1 L
75%
Haverfordwest H
2 - 0 W
55%
Colwyn Bay A
0 - 0 D
52%
Caernarfon A
0 - 2 L
48%
Barry Town H
0 - 2 L
56%
Colwyn Bay H
0 - 0 D
48%
Connah's Quay Nomads A
1 - 2 L
47%
TNS H
1 - 2 L
46%
Barry Town A
0 - 1 L
61%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Flora A
0 - 1 L
74%
Sabah H
1 - 2 L
95%
Sabah A
0 - 2 L
97%
Barry Town A
1 - 0 W
61%
Connah's Quay Nomads H
2 - 1 W
42%
Caernarfon A
4 - 0 W
48%
Colwyn Bay H
0 - 2 L
48%
Penybont A
2 - 1 W
36%
Connah's Quay Nomads A
2 - 1 W
47%
Barry Town H
0 - 2 L
56%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 40.4 vs 44.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Offensively, TNS outperforms Penybont with 1.2 goals per match to 0.4, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Penybont giving up 1.3 and TNS giving up 1.2 per fixture.

TNS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

TNS is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.1 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Penybont is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: TNS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. TNS is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Penybont shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 14.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for TNS. In practical terms, TNS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While TNS holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 14.3-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Cymru Premier match (2026-03-14), TNS prevailed 1-2 against Penybont. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, TNS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Penybont shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Penybont will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TNS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Penybont

Penybont

VS
TNS

TNS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Penybont

1W 2D 7L · 4 goals scored · 13 conceded

TNS

5W 0D 5L · 12 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or