Penybont vs TNS Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compara Penybont vs TNS: estadísticas cara a cara, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Penybont
Equipo Local
TNS
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Penybont
Empate
TNS
Comparación Estadística
1V, 2E, 7D
5V, 0E, 5D
4 / 10 partidos
12 / 10 partidos
13 / 10 partidos
12 / 10 partidos
-9
0
3 / 10 partidos
2 / 10 partidos
3 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
2 / 10 partidos
4 / 10 partidos
1V / 5 partidos
1V / 4 partidos
0V / 5 partidos
4V / 6 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 51.6, Calidad del Rival: 56.4
Dificultad de Liga: 58.7, Calidad del Rival: 60.4
0V / 2 partidos
0V / 3 partidos
Real: 0.4 | Dif: +0.01
Real: 1.2 | Dif: +0.06
Ataque: 12.1, Defensa: 51.2, Forma: 9.0
Ataque: 37.8, Defensa: 56.8, Forma: 47.3
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Penybont
TNS
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 40.4 vs 44.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Offensively, TNS outperforms Penybont with 1.2 goals per match to 0.4, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Penybont giving up 1.3 and TNS giving up 1.2 per fixture.
TNS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
TNS is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.1 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Penybont is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: TNS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. TNS is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Penybont shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 14.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for TNS. In practical terms, TNS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While TNS holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 14.3-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
In their recent Cymru Premier match (2026-03-14), TNS prevailed 1-2 against Penybont. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, TNS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Penybont shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Penybont will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TNS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Penybont
TNS
En los enfrentamientos H2H (duelos directos), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo impone sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen comparativo
Esta comparación de enfrentamientos directos analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia en la forma y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las valoraciones de potencia se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles marcados, los goles en contra, la tasa de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Penybont
1W 2D 7L · 4 goles marcados · 13 goles en contra
TNS
5W 0D 5L · 12 goles marcados · 12 goles en contra
Equipos Populares