Skip to content
Compare Radcliffe vs Scarborough

Radcliffe vs Scarborough Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Radcliffe vs Scarborough: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Radcliffe Radcliffe Home Team
Scarborough Scarborough Away Team
Radcliffe
28.9
D D W L L L L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Scarborough
39.9
L L D W L W W D W D

Performance Radar

Radcliffe
Scarborough

Categories Won

4

Radcliffe

3

Draw

8

Scarborough

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 3D, 6L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Clegg (6 goals)
S. Walker (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.2

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 43.3

37.1

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.73

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.37

0.84

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.26

Adjusted Power Rating
28.9

Attack: 32.7, Defense: 20.8, Form: 8.9

39.9

Attack: 31.9, Defense: 49.4, Form: 34.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

2

31-45'

3

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

5
2

76-90+'

4
Radcliffe
Scarborough
Radcliffe

Power Rating Breakdown

28.9

Overall

Attack 32.7
Defense 20.8
Form 8.9
Consistency 74.8
Scarborough

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 31.9
Defense 49.4
Form 34.8
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

33.0 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

43.3 vs 40.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Radcliffe logo Radcliffe
D
Barrow (40%)
D
Shrewsbury (40%)
W
Macclesfield (39%)
L
Hereford (45%)
L
Kidderminster (67%)
L
South Shields (42%)
L
Fylde (52%)
D
Curzon Ashton (27%)
Scarborough logo Scarborough
L
Barnsley (43%)
L
Buxton (60%)
D
Bedford (49%)
W
Merthyr (30%)
L
Buxton (60%)
W
Spennymoor (40%)
W
Darlington (30%)
D
Chorley (32%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barrow H
0 - 0 D
40%
Shrewsbury H
0 - 0 D
40%
Macclesfield H
1 - 0 W
39%
Hereford A
1 - 3 L
45%
Kidderminster H
1 - 3 L
67%
South Shields H
2 - 5 L
42%
Fylde A
3 - 4 L
52%
Curzon Ashton H
3 - 3 D
27%
Worksop A
0 - 2 L
51%
Darlington A
0 - 3 L
30%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barnsley H
0 - 2 L
43%
Buxton A
2 - 4 L
60%
Bedford A
1 - 1 D
49%
Merthyr H
2 - 1 W
30%
Buxton A
0 - 2 L
60%
Spennymoor H
1 - 0 W
40%
Darlington A
2 - 1 W
30%
Chorley H
0 - 0 D
32%
Leamington A
2 - 1 W
31%
Telford H
1 - 1 D
34%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 39.2 vs 37.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

The attacking output of Radcliffe and Scarborough is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.1 and 1.1 goals per game respectively.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Scarborough — 1.3 goals conceded per game and 2 clean sheets put them well ahead of Radcliffe, who give up 2.3 goals per match at the other end.

Radcliffe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Scarborough has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Radcliffe is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Scarborough has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Scarborough is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Radcliffe shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Scarborough. In practical terms, Scarborough would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Scarborough, with a 11.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Radcliffe

Radcliffe

VS
Scarborough

Scarborough

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Radcliffe

1W 3D 6L · 11 goals scored · 23 conceded

Scarborough

4W 3D 3L · 11 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or