Scarborough vs Radcliffe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Scarborough vs Radcliffe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Scarborough
Home Team
Radcliffe
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Scarborough
Draw
Radcliffe
Statistical Comparison
4W, 3D, 3L
1W, 3D, 6L
11 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
23 / 10 matches
-2
-12
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.9
League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 43.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.26
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.37
Attack: 31.9, Defense: 49.4, Form: 34.8
Attack: 32.7, Defense: 20.8, Form: 8.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Scarborough
Radcliffe
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (37.1 vs 39.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Scarborough averaging 1.1 and Radcliffe averaging 1.1 goals per match.
Defensively, Scarborough is far superior, conceding just 1.3 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Radcliffe leaks 2.3 goals per match.
Scarborough has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Radcliffe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: Scarborough has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Radcliffe is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Scarborough is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Radcliffe shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Scarborough. In practical terms, Scarborough would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Scarborough has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Scarborough
Radcliffe
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Scarborough
4W 3D 3L · 11 goals scored · 13 conceded
Radcliffe
1W 3D 6L · 11 goals scored · 23 conceded
Popular Teams