Skip to content
Compare Scarborough vs Radcliffe

Scarborough vs Radcliffe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Scarborough vs Radcliffe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Scarborough Scarborough Home Team
Radcliffe Radcliffe Away Team
Scarborough
39.9
L L D W L W W D W D

Last 10 Matches

Radcliffe
28.9
D D W L L L L D L L

Performance Radar

Scarborough
Radcliffe

Categories Won

8

Scarborough

3

Draw

4

Radcliffe

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Walker (3 goals)
R. Clegg (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.1

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.9

39.2

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 43.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.84

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.26

0.73

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.37

Adjusted Power Rating
39.9

Attack: 31.9, Defense: 49.4, Form: 34.8

28.9

Attack: 32.7, Defense: 20.8, Form: 8.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

3
5

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

2
Scarborough
Radcliffe
Scarborough

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 31.9
Defense 49.4
Form 34.8
Consistency 50.5
Radcliffe

Power Rating Breakdown

28.9

Overall

Attack 32.7
Defense 20.8
Form 8.9
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

40.9 vs 43.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Scarborough logo Scarborough
L
Barnsley (43%)
L
Buxton (60%)
D
Bedford (49%)
W
Merthyr (30%)
L
Buxton (60%)
W
Spennymoor (40%)
W
Darlington (30%)
D
Chorley (32%)
Radcliffe logo Radcliffe
D
Barrow (40%)
D
Shrewsbury (40%)
W
Macclesfield (39%)
L
Hereford (45%)
L
Kidderminster (67%)
L
South Shields (42%)
L
Fylde (52%)
D
Curzon Ashton (27%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barnsley H
0 - 2 L
43%
Buxton A
2 - 4 L
60%
Bedford A
1 - 1 D
49%
Merthyr H
2 - 1 W
30%
Buxton A
0 - 2 L
60%
Spennymoor H
1 - 0 W
40%
Darlington A
2 - 1 W
30%
Chorley H
0 - 0 D
32%
Leamington A
2 - 1 W
31%
Telford H
1 - 1 D
34%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barrow H
0 - 0 D
40%
Shrewsbury H
0 - 0 D
40%
Macclesfield H
1 - 0 W
39%
Hereford A
1 - 3 L
45%
Kidderminster H
1 - 3 L
67%
South Shields H
2 - 5 L
42%
Fylde A
3 - 4 L
52%
Curzon Ashton H
3 - 3 D
27%
Worksop A
0 - 2 L
51%
Darlington A
0 - 3 L
30%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (37.1 vs 39.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Scarborough averaging 1.1 and Radcliffe averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Defensively, Scarborough is far superior, conceding just 1.3 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Radcliffe leaks 2.3 goals per match.

Scarborough has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Radcliffe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Scarborough has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Radcliffe is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Scarborough is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Radcliffe shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Scarborough. In practical terms, Scarborough would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Scarborough has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Scarborough

Scarborough

VS
Radcliffe

Radcliffe

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Scarborough

4W 3D 3L · 11 goals scored · 13 conceded

Radcliffe

1W 3D 6L · 11 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or