Thun vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Thun vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Thun
Home Team
Napredak
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Thun
Draw
Napredak
Statistical Comparison
3W, 1D, 6L
1W, 1D, 8L
16 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
-5
-13
0 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
1W / 6 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 52.1
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.9
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.12
Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.03
Attack: 47.3, Defense: 26.6, Form: 26.6
Attack: 21.1, Defense: 38.7, Form: 10.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Thun
Napredak
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Napredak has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.5) compared to Thun (SoS: 38.6). This means Napredak's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Thun's attack is on another level, averaging 1.6 goals per match with E. Rastoder leading the charge with 4 goals. Napredak manages just 0.6 per match.
Both defenses are comparable, with Thun conceding 2.1 and Napredak conceding 1.9 per match.
Napredak has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.
Thun has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Thun
Napredak
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Thun
3W 1D 6L · 16 goals scored · 21 conceded
Napredak
1W 1D 8L · 6 goals scored · 19 conceded
Popular Teams