NAC vs Telstar Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compara NAC vs Telstar: estadísticas cara a cara, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
NAC
Equipo Local
Telstar
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
NAC
Empate
Telstar
Comparación Estadística
2V, 3E, 5D
6V, 1E, 3D
10 / 10 partidos
21 / 10 partidos
20 / 10 partidos
14 / 10 partidos
-10
+7
2 / 10 partidos
2 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
8 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
6 / 10 partidos
1V / 4 partidos
4V / 5 partidos
1V / 6 partidos
2V / 5 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 73.0, Calidad del Rival: 58.8
Dificultad de Liga: 80.0, Calidad del Rival: 58.3
0V / 3 partidos
1V / 3 partidos
Real: 1.0 | Dif: -0.23
Real: 2.1 | Dif: -0.27
Ataque: 33.3, Defensa: 33.3, Forma: 20.0
Ataque: 77.5, Defensa: 59.0, Forma: 66.4
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
NAC
Telstar
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
Context matters here: Telstar's schedule strength (SoS: 60.7) has been notably more demanding than NAC's (SoS: 49.8), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Telstar's attack is on another level, averaging 2.1 goals per match with S. van Duijn leading the charge (4 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
Telstar has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to NAC's 2.0.
NAC has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Telstar has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Telstar has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: NAC is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Telstar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Telstar is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while NAC shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Telstar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If NAC can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 30.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Telstar. In practical terms, Telstar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Telstar is the clear and dominant favorite. With a power rating of 64.4 vs 33.5, and superior metrics across the board, Telstar should win this comfortably.
In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-02-27), Telstar prevailed 3-0 against NAC. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Telstar secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Telstar completely dominated NAC in that encounter, raising serious questions about NAC's ability to compete at this level. NAC will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Telstar will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
NAC
Telstar
En los enfrentamientos H2H (duelos directos), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo impone sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen comparativo
Esta comparación de enfrentamientos directos analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia en la forma y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las valoraciones de potencia se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles marcados, los goles en contra, la tasa de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
NAC
2W 3D 5L · 10 goles marcados · 20 goles en contra
Telstar
6W 1D 3L · 21 goles marcados · 14 goles en contra
Equipos Populares