Skip to content
Compare Egnatia vs Lillestrøm

Egnatia vs Lillestrøm Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Egnatia vs Lillestrøm: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Egnatia Egnatia Home Team
Lillestrøm Lillestrøm Away Team
Egnatia
63.8
D W L D D W D

Last 10 Matches

Lillestrøm
35.7
D D L L L W W L L W

Performance Radar

Egnatia
Lillestrøm

Categories Won

9

Egnatia

2

Draw

4

Lillestrøm

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
29%

2W, 4D, 1L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.6

18 / 7 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

11 / 7 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
14%

1 / 7 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
71%

5 / 7 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
86%

6 / 7 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Albanese (3 goals)
G. Nyheim (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 3 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
66.6

League Difficulty: 91.9, Opponent Quality: 71.1

39.7

League Difficulty: 53.5, Opponent Quality: 52.2

Elite Opponent Record
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
3.19

Actual: 2.6 | Diff: -0.62

0.87

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
63.8

Attack: 100, Defense: 54.4, Form: 33.8

35.7

Attack: 29.9, Defense: 44.9, Form: 26.9

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

4

31-45'

3

46-60'

2

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

3
Egnatia
Lillestrøm
Egnatia

Power Rating Breakdown

63.8

Overall

Attack 100
Defense 54.4
Form 33.8
Consistency 66.9
Lillestrøm

Power Rating Breakdown

35.7

Overall

Attack 29.9
Defense 44.9
Form 26.9
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.9 vs 53.5

Opponent Quality

71.1 vs 52.2

Elite Opponent Record

20% vs 0%
Egnatia logo Egnatia
D
Lillestrøm (56%)
W
Shamrock (67%)
L
Shamrock (72%)
D
Celje (76%)
D
Celje (71%)
W
Petrocub (77%)
D
Petrocub (79%)
Lillestrøm logo Lillestrøm
D
Egnatia (78%)
D
KFUM (47%)
L
Rosenborg (51%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (75%)
L
Viking (59%)
W
KFUM (42%)
W
Fredrikstad (53%)
L
HamKam (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lillestrøm H
0 - 0 D
56%
Shamrock H
5 - 1 W
67%
Shamrock A
1 - 3 L
72%
Celje A
2 - 2 D
76%
Celje H
3 - 3 D
71%
Petrocub H
6 - 1 W
77%
Petrocub A
1 - 1 D
79%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Egnatia A
0 - 0 D
78%
KFUM A
1 - 1 D
47%
Rosenborg H
0 - 2 L
51%
Bodø/Glimt A
0 - 4 L
75%
Viking H
1 - 2 L
59%
KFUM H
2 - 1 W
42%
Fredrikstad A
2 - 0 W
53%
HamKam A
0 - 2 L
44%
Kristiansund H
1 - 2 L
35%
Sandefjord H
3 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Egnatia has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.6) compared to Lillestrøm (SoS: 39.7). This means Egnatia's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.

Few sides can match Egnatia in front of goal. Their 2.6 average per fixture tells the story, with A. Albanese driving that output personally responsible for 3 goals this campaign.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Egnatia giving up 1.6 and Lillestrøm giving up 1.5 per fixture.

Egnatia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Egnatia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 7 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Egnatia faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Lillestrøm can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 28.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Egnatia. In practical terms, Egnatia would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Egnatia emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (63.8 vs 35.7) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the UEFA Europa League (2026-08-20). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Egnatia

Egnatia

VS
Lillestrøm

Lillestrøm

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Egnatia

2W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 11 conceded

Lillestrøm

3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or