Egnatia vs Lillestrøm Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Egnatia vs Lillestrøm: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Lillestrøm
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Egnatia
Draw
Lillestrøm
Statistical Comparison
2W, 4D, 1L
3W, 2D, 5L
18 / 7 matches
10 / 10 matches
11 / 7 matches
15 / 10 matches
+7
-5
1 / 7 matches
2 / 10 matches
5 / 7 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 7 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 3 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 91.9, Opponent Quality: 71.1
League Difficulty: 53.5, Opponent Quality: 52.2
1W / 5 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 2.6 | Diff: -0.62
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.13
Attack: 100, Defense: 54.4, Form: 33.8
Attack: 29.9, Defense: 44.9, Form: 26.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Lillestrøm
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
Egnatia has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.6) compared to Lillestrøm (SoS: 39.7). This means Egnatia's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Few sides can match Egnatia in front of goal. Their 2.6 average per fixture tells the story, with A. Albanese driving that output personally responsible for 3 goals this campaign.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Egnatia giving up 1.6 and Lillestrøm giving up 1.5 per fixture.
Egnatia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Egnatia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 7 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Egnatia faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Lillestrøm can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 28.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Egnatia. In practical terms, Egnatia would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Egnatia emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (63.8 vs 35.7) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
These two teams drew 0-0 in the UEFA Europa League (2026-08-20). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Egnatia
Lillestrøm
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Egnatia
2W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 11 conceded
Lillestrøm
3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams