Glenavon vs Cliftonville Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Glenavon vs Cliftonville: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Glenavon
Home Team
Cliftonville
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Glenavon
Draw
Cliftonville
Statistical Comparison
1W, 4D, 5L
7W, 0D, 3L
8 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
-9
+8
2 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
0W / 6 matches
5W / 7 matches
1W / 4 matches
2W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 42.9, Opponent Quality: 50.9
League Difficulty: 43.2, Opponent Quality: 48.1
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.1
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1
Attack: 26.1, Defense: 42.3, Form: 9.8
Attack: 51.3, Defense: 70.5, Form: 67.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Glenavon
Cliftonville
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (47.7 vs 46.1), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Cliftonville leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to Glenavon's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Defensively, Cliftonville is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while Glenavon leaks 1.7 goals per match.
Glenavon has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Cliftonville has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Cliftonville is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.4 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Glenavon is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
🔥 Form Momentum: Cliftonville is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 16 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Cliftonville is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Glenavon shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 27.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Cliftonville. In practical terms, Cliftonville would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Cliftonville in this contest. Their superior power rating of 59.7, compared to 32.7 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Glenavon
Cliftonville
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Glenavon
1W 4D 5L · 8 goals scored · 17 conceded
Cliftonville
7W 0D 3L · 16 goals scored · 8 conceded
Popular Teams