Skip to content
Compare Minnesota vs Whitecaps

Minnesota vs Whitecaps Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Minnesota vs Whitecaps: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Minnesota Minnesota Home Team
Whitecaps Whitecaps Away Team
Minnesota
42.0
W L D D D L D L L D

Last 10 Matches

Whitecaps
49.4
W L W D D L W L W D

Performance Radar

Minnesota
Whitecaps

Categories Won

3

Minnesota

2

Draw

10

Whitecaps

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 5D, 4L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Yeboah (3 goals)
B. White (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.7

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 47.9

41.0

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 54.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.35

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.05

2.0

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
42.0

Attack: 43.6, Defense: 57.1, Form: 10.1

49.4

Attack: 57.6, Defense: 54.6, Form: 36.4

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

5
2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

4
Minnesota
Whitecaps
Minnesota

Power Rating Breakdown

42.0

Overall

Attack 43.6
Defense 57.1
Form 10.1
Consistency 77.2
Whitecaps

Power Rating Breakdown

49.4

Overall

Attack 57.6
Defense 54.6
Form 36.4
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

47.9 vs 54.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Minnesota logo Minnesota
W
Earthquakes (38%)
L
Atlanta United (44%)
D
Salt Lake (54%)
D
San Diego (54%)
D
Whitecaps (55%)
L
Sporting KC (46%)
D
Salt Lake (49%)
L
New England (53%)
Whitecaps logo Whitecaps
W
Dallas (53%)
L
Houston (65%)
W
Sounders (36%)
D
LAFC (53%)
D
Minnesota (50%)
L
Cincinnati (61%)
W
San Diego (59%)
L
Houston (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Earthquakes A
5 - 1 W
38%
Atlanta United H
1 - 2 L
44%
Salt Lake A
1 - 1 D
54%
San Diego H
1 - 1 D
54%
Whitecaps H
0 - 0 D
55%
Sporting KC A
1 - 2 L
46%
Salt Lake H
1 - 1 D
49%
New England A
1 - 2 L
53%
Colorado H
0 - 1 L
49%
Austin H
2 - 2 D
37%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dallas H
5 - 0 W
53%
Houston H
0 - 1 L
65%
Sounders A
2 - 0 W
36%
LAFC H
1 - 1 D
53%
Minnesota A
0 - 0 D
50%
Cincinnati A
3 - 4 L
61%
San Diego A
4 - 2 W
59%
Houston A
0 - 1 L
70%
Dallas A
3 - 2 W
58%
Earthquakes A
1 - 1 D
38%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (50.7 vs 41.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Whitecaps leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.9 goals per game compared to Minnesota's 1.3 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Both defenses are comparable, with Minnesota conceding 1.3 and Whitecaps conceding 1.2 per match.

Minnesota has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Minnesota is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Whitecaps has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Whitecaps is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Minnesota shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 68% win probability for Whitecaps. In practical terms, Whitecaps would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Whitecaps holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 7.4-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Major League Soccer (2026-07-26). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Minnesota

Minnesota

VS
Whitecaps

Whitecaps

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Minnesota

1W 5D 4L · 13 goals scored · 13 conceded

Whitecaps

4W 3D 3L · 19 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or