Skip to content
Compare Minnesota vs Whitecaps

Minnesota vs Whitecaps Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Minnesota vs Whitecaps: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Minnesota Minnesota Home Team
Whitecaps Whitecaps Away Team
Minnesota
52.9
D L L D W L W W W W

Last 10 Matches

Whitecaps
63.0
W L W D D W W W W L

Performance Radar

Minnesota
Whitecaps

Categories Won

3

Minnesota

6

Draw

6

Whitecaps

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Yeboah (6 goals)
B. White (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.7

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.1

52.5

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.34

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.06

2.02

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
52.9

Attack: 47.9, Defense: 65.0, Form: 51.4

63.0

Attack: 68.3, Defense: 64.9, Form: 61.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

6
2

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

4

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

6
Minnesota
Whitecaps
Minnesota

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 47.9
Defense 65.0
Form 51.4
Consistency 45.7
Whitecaps

Power Rating Breakdown

63.0

Overall

Attack 68.3
Defense 64.9
Form 61.5
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

51.1 vs 50.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Minnesota logo Minnesota
D
Salt Lake (56%)
L
New England (66%)
L
Colorado (39%)
D
Austin (40%)
W
Columbus (55%)
L
LAFC (46%)
W
Dallas (62%)
W
Portland (46%)
Whitecaps logo Whitecaps
W
San Diego (44%)
L
Houston (55%)
W
Dallas (62%)
D
Earthquakes (68%)
D
Galaxy (57%)
W
Colorado (39%)
W
Sporting KC (31%)
W
NYCFC (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Salt Lake H
1 - 1 D
56%
New England A
1 - 2 L
66%
Colorado H
0 - 1 L
39%
Austin H
2 - 2 D
40%
Columbus A
3 - 2 W
55%
LAFC H
0 - 1 L
46%
Dallas A
1 - 0 W
62%
Portland H
2 - 0 W
46%
San Diego A
2 - 1 W
44%
Galaxy A
2 - 1 W
57%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
San Diego A
4 - 2 W
44%
Houston A
0 - 1 L
55%
Dallas A
3 - 2 W
62%
Earthquakes A
1 - 1 D
68%
Galaxy A
1 - 1 D
57%
Colorado H
3 - 1 W
39%
Sporting KC H
3 - 0 W
31%
NYCFC H
2 - 0 W
43%
Portland H
3 - 2 W
46%
Earthquakes H
0 - 1 L
63%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.7 vs 52.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Whitecaps holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Minnesota's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Minnesota conceding 1.1 and Whitecaps conceding 1.1 per match.

Minnesota has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Whitecaps has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Whitecaps, who boasts a 80% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Minnesota is a strong road team with a 80% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Whitecaps has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Minnesota

Minnesota

VS
Whitecaps

Whitecaps

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Minnesota

5W 2D 3L · 14 goals scored · 11 conceded

Whitecaps

6W 2D 2L · 20 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or