Skip to content
Compare Zrinjski vs C Palace

Zrinjski vs C Palace Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Zrinjski vs C Palace: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Zrinjski Zrinjski Home Team
C Palace C Palace Away Team
Zrinjski
48.0
D L W W L D D L

Last 10 Matches

C Palace
46.1
L W W L W W L D L D

Performance Radar

Zrinjski
C Palace

Categories Won

5

Zrinjski

3

Draw

7

C Palace

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
25%

2W, 3D, 3L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

13 / 8 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

9 / 8 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
12%

1 / 8 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
38%

3 / 8 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

4 / 8 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Cvetković (1 goals)
J. Mateta (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 3 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.5

League Difficulty: 69.8, Opponent Quality: 61.6

51.4

League Difficulty: 74.8, Opponent Quality: 61.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.69

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.07

1.63

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
48.0

Attack: 53.1, Defense: 63.0, Form: 24.9

46.1

Attack: 54.1, Defense: 43.9, Form: 40.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

2
Zrinjski
C Palace
Zrinjski

Power Rating Breakdown

48.0

Overall

Attack 53.1
Defense 63.0
Form 24.9
Consistency 59.2
C Palace

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 54.1
Defense 43.9
Form 40.6
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

69.8 vs 74.8

Opponent Quality

61.6 vs 61.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Zrinjski logo Zrinjski
D
Valur (66%)
L
Valur (68%)
W
Posušje (42%)
W
Arsenal (42%)
L
C Palace (63%)
D
C Palace (58%)
D
Rapid Vienna (85%)
L
Raków (69%)
C Palace logo C Palace
L
Everton (73%)
W
Fulham (48%)
W
Ula (43%)
L
Bromley (48%)
W
Swindon (36%)
W
Rayo (56%)
L
Arsenal (78%)
D
Brentford (81%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Valur H
2 - 2 D
66%
Valur A
0 - 1 L
68%
Posušje H
3 - 1 W
42%
Arsenal H
6 - 0 W
42%
C Palace A
0 - 2 L
63%
C Palace H
1 - 1 D
58%
Rapid Vienna H
1 - 1 D
85%
Raków A
0 - 1 L
69%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Everton A
0 - 2 L
73%
Fulham A
2 - 1 W
48%
Ula H
3 - 1 W
43%
Bromley A
0 - 3 L
48%
Swindon H
5 - 1 W
36%
Rayo H
1 - 0 W
56%
Arsenal H
1 - 2 L
78%
Brentford A
2 - 2 D
81%
Man City A
0 - 3 L
83%
Everton H
2 - 2 D
68%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (49.5 vs 51.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Zrinjski averaging 1.6 and C Palace averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Defensively, Zrinjski holds the advantage — allowing just 1.1 goals per game against C Palace's 1.7.

C Palace has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Zrinjski is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 8 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: C Palace's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-02-26), C Palace came out on top with a 2-0 victory over Zrinjski. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. C Palace secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Zrinjski will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. C Palace will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams drew 1-1 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-02-19). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Zrinjski

Zrinjski

VS
C Palace

C Palace

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Zrinjski

2W 3D 3L · 13 goals scored · 9 conceded

C Palace

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or