Cumbernauld C. vs Tranent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Cumbernauld C. vs Tranent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Cumbernauld C.
Home Team
Tranent
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Cumbernauld C.
Draw
Tranent
Statistical Comparison
3W, 4D, 3L
6W, 2D, 2L
22 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
22 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
0
+10
0 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
3W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 30.3
League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 33.0
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.72
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.49
Attack: 57.9, Defense: 21.1, Form: 23.7
Attack: 45.2, Defense: 61.2, Form: 47.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Cumbernauld C.
Tranent
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 29.0 vs 29.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Cumbernauld C. leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.2 goals per game compared to Tranent's 1.7 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Tranent — 0.7 goals conceded per game and 5 clean sheets put them well ahead of Cumbernauld C., who give up 2.2 goals per match at the other end.
Cumbernauld C. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Tranent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Tranent is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.4 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Tranent has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Tranent is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Cumbernauld C. shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 12.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 82% win probability for Tranent. In practical terms, Tranent would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While Tranent holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 12.6-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Cumbernauld C.
Tranent
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Cumbernauld C.
3W 4D 3L · 22 goals scored · 22 conceded
Tranent
6W 2D 2L · 17 goals scored · 7 conceded
Popular Teams