Gretna vs Tranent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Gretna vs Tranent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Gretna
Home Team
Tranent
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Gretna
Draw
Tranent
Statistical Comparison
1W, 2D, 7L
6W, 2D, 2L
12 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
36 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
-24
+10
0 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 39.6
League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 33.0
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.2
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.49
Attack: 33.5, Defense: 0.0, Form: 8.4
Attack: 45.2, Defense: 61.2, Form: 47.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Gretna
Tranent
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 33.8 vs 29.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Tranent holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Gretna's 1.2, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Defensively, Tranent is far superior, conceding just 0.7 goals per match with 5 clean sheets, while Gretna leaks 3.6 goals per match.
Gretna has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Tranent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Tranent is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Statistical modeling projects 3.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Gretna is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Tranent has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Tranent is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Gretna shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 27.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Tranent. In practical terms, Tranent would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Tranent in this contest. Their superior power rating of 51.0, compared to 23.7 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Gretna
Tranent
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Gretna
1W 2D 7L · 12 goals scored · 36 conceded
Tranent
6W 2D 2L · 17 goals scored · 7 conceded
Popular Teams