Skip to content
Compare Kidderminster vs Worksop

Kidderminster vs Worksop Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kidderminster vs Worksop: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kidderminster Kidderminster Home Team
Worksop Worksop Away Team
Kidderminster
82.2
W W W W W W W W W W

Last 10 Matches

Worksop
49.7
L W W L D W W L W L

Performance Radar

Kidderminster
Worksop

Categories Won

11

Kidderminster

4

Draw

0

Worksop

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
100%

10W, 0D, 0L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.7

27 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+21

+21

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Donnelly (6 goals)
L. Whitham (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
100%

3W / 3 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
100%

7W / 7 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.3

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 39.2

36.1

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 40.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.33

Actual: 2.7 | Diff: +0.37

1.7

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.4

Adjusted Power Rating
82.2

Attack: 78.6, Defense: 69.8, Form: 87.3

49.7

Attack: 60.3, Defense: 51.7, Form: 43.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

3
6

31-45'

5
4

46-60'

5
1

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

3
Kidderminster
Worksop
Kidderminster

Power Rating Breakdown

82.2

Overall

Attack 78.6
Defense 69.8
Form 87.3
Consistency 100.0
Worksop

Power Rating Breakdown

49.7

Overall

Attack 60.3
Defense 51.7
Form 43.0
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

34.5 vs 30.0

Opponent Quality

39.2 vs 40.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kidderminster logo Kidderminster
W
Stratford (43%)
W
Halesowen (43%)
W
Droitwich Spa (43%)
W
South Shields (47%)
W
Macclesfield (39%)
W
South Shields (42%)
W
Leamington (31%)
W
Radcliffe (30%)
Worksop logo Worksop
L
Chorley (37%)
W
Peterborough S (24%)
W
Spennymoor (45%)
L
Buxton (55%)
D
Alfreton (44%)
W
Radcliffe (25%)
W
Fylde (46%)
L
Marine (37%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Stratford A
5 - 0 W
43%
Halesowen A
2 - 0 W
43%
Droitwich Spa A
2 - 0 W
43%
South Shields A
2 - 0 W
47%
Macclesfield H
3 - 1 W
39%
South Shields H
1 - 0 W
42%
Leamington A
3 - 2 W
31%
Radcliffe A
3 - 1 W
30%
King's Lynn H
4 - 1 W
35%
Telford A
2 - 1 W
39%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chorley A
1 - 2 L
37%
Peterborough S H
8 - 0 W
24%
Spennymoor A
1 - 0 W
45%
Buxton H
1 - 2 L
55%
Alfreton A
1 - 1 D
44%
Radcliffe H
2 - 0 W
25%
Fylde H
1 - 0 W
46%
Marine A
2 - 4 L
37%
Bedford A
2 - 0 W
49%
Hereford H
2 - 3 L
40%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 37.3 vs 36.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Kidderminster leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.7 goals per game compared to Worksop's 2.1 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Kidderminster holds the advantage — allowing just 0.6 goals per game against Worksop's 1.2.

Kidderminster has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Worksop has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Kidderminster has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Kidderminster is a strong road performer with a 100% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 3.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

🔥 Form Momentum: Kidderminster is in scorching form, winning 10 of their last 10 matches with 27 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📈 Form Momentum: Worksop has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Kidderminster is on the rise with 10W in last 10, while Worksop shows signs of decline with 5W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 32.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Kidderminster. In practical terms, Kidderminster would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, Kidderminster emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 82.2 compared to 49.7, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects Kidderminster as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kidderminster

Kidderminster

VS
Worksop

Worksop

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Kidderminster

10W 0D 0L · 27 goals scored · 6 conceded

Worksop

5W 1D 4L · 21 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or