Kidderminster vs Worksop Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compara Kidderminster vs Worksop: estadísticas cara a cara, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Kidderminster
Equipo Local
Worksop
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Kidderminster
Empate
Worksop
Comparación Estadística
10V, 0E, 0D
5V, 1E, 4D
27 / 10 partidos
21 / 10 partidos
6 / 10 partidos
12 / 10 partidos
+21
+9
5 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
6 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
3V / 3 partidos
3V / 5 partidos
7V / 7 partidos
2V / 5 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 34.5, Calidad del Rival: 39.2
Dificultad de Liga: 30.0, Calidad del Rival: 40.2
0V / 0 partidos
0V / 0 partidos
Real: 2.7 | Dif: +0.37
Real: 2.1 | Dif: +0.4
Ataque: 78.6, Defensa: 69.8, Forma: 87.3
Ataque: 60.3, Defensa: 51.7, Forma: 43.0
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Kidderminster
Worksop
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 37.3 vs 36.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Kidderminster leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.7 goals per game compared to Worksop's 2.1 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Defensively, Kidderminster holds the advantage — allowing just 0.6 goals per game against Worksop's 1.2.
Kidderminster has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Worksop has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Kidderminster has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Kidderminster is a strong road performer with a 100% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Statistical modeling projects 3.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
🔥 Form Momentum: Kidderminster is in scorching form, winning 10 of their last 10 matches with 27 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
📈 Form Momentum: Worksop has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Kidderminster is on the rise with 10W in last 10, while Worksop shows signs of decline with 5W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 32.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Kidderminster. In practical terms, Kidderminster would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, Kidderminster emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 82.2 compared to 49.7, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects Kidderminster as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Kidderminster
Worksop
En los enfrentamientos H2H (duelos directos), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo impone sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen comparativo
Esta comparación de enfrentamientos directos analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia en la forma y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las valoraciones de potencia se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles marcados, los goles en contra, la tasa de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Kidderminster
10W 0D 0L · 27 goles marcados · 6 goles en contra
Worksop
5W 1D 4L · 21 goles marcados · 12 goles en contra
Equipos Populares