Skip to content
Compare Whitecaps vs Earthquakes

Whitecaps vs Earthquakes Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Whitecaps vs Earthquakes: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Whitecaps Whitecaps Home Team
Earthquakes Earthquakes Away Team
Whitecaps
63.0
W L W D D W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Earthquakes
67.4
W L L D D W W W W W

Performance Radar

Whitecaps
Earthquakes

Categories Won

4

Whitecaps

3

Draw

8

Earthquakes

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.7

27 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+9

+9

+13

+13

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. White (5 goals)
P. Judd (9 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.5

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.8

52.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.02

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.02

2.51

Actual: 2.7 | Diff: +0.19

Adjusted Power Rating
63.0

Attack: 68.3, Defense: 64.9, Form: 61.5

67.4

Attack: 91.9, Defense: 54.5, Form: 61.3

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

7
6

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2

46-60'

6
3

61-75'

3
6

76-90+'

7
Whitecaps
Earthquakes
Whitecaps

Power Rating Breakdown

63.0

Overall

Attack 68.3
Defense 64.9
Form 61.5
Consistency 52.0
Earthquakes

Power Rating Breakdown

67.4

Overall

Attack 91.9
Defense 54.5
Form 61.3
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.8 vs 50.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Whitecaps logo Whitecaps
W
San Diego (44%)
L
Houston (55%)
W
Dallas (62%)
D
Earthquakes (68%)
D
Galaxy (57%)
W
Colorado (39%)
W
Sporting KC (31%)
W
NYCFC (43%)
Earthquakes logo Earthquakes
W
Portland (51%)
L
Dallas (57%)
L
Sounders (62%)
D
Whitecaps (61%)
D
Toronto (49%)
W
St. Louis (57%)
W
Austin (40%)
W
LAFC (51%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
San Diego A
4 - 2 W
44%
Houston A
0 - 1 L
55%
Dallas A
3 - 2 W
62%
Earthquakes A
1 - 1 D
68%
Galaxy A
1 - 1 D
57%
Colorado H
3 - 1 W
39%
Sporting KC H
3 - 0 W
31%
NYCFC H
2 - 0 W
43%
Portland H
3 - 2 W
46%
Earthquakes H
0 - 1 L
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Portland A
3 - 1 W
51%
Dallas H
2 - 3 L
57%
Sounders A
2 - 3 L
62%
Whitecaps H
1 - 1 D
61%
Toronto A
1 - 1 D
49%
St. Louis A
3 - 2 W
57%
Austin H
5 - 1 W
40%
LAFC A
4 - 1 W
51%
Sporting KC A
3 - 1 W
36%
San Diego H
3 - 0 W
38%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.5 vs 52.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Earthquakes holds the attacking edge with 2.7 goals per match versus Whitecaps's 2.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Whitecaps conceding 1.1 and Earthquakes conceding 1.4 per match.

Whitecaps has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Earthquakes has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Whitecaps, who boasts a 80% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Earthquakes is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 1-1 in the US Major League Soccer (2026-05-10). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. In their recent US Major League Soccer match (2026-03-22), Earthquakes prevailed 0-1 against Whitecaps. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Earthquakes achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Whitecaps shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Whitecaps will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Earthquakes will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Whitecaps

Whitecaps

VS
Earthquakes

Earthquakes

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Whitecaps

6W 2D 2L · 20 goals scored · 11 conceded

Earthquakes

6W 2D 2L · 27 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or