Skip to content
Compare Clyde vs Forfar

Clyde vs Forfar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Clyde vs Forfar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Clyde Clyde Home Team
Forfar Forfar Away Team
Clyde
41.2
L W L W L D D W L W

Last 10 Matches

Forfar
40.1
W L L L L D W W W W

Performance Radar

Clyde
Forfar

Categories Won

8

Clyde

3

Draw

4

Forfar

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Connell (6 goals)
S. Shepherd (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.9

League Difficulty: 42.4, Opponent Quality: 46.6

41.9

League Difficulty: 38.5, Opponent Quality: 44.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.42

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.18

1.13

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
41.2

Attack: 50.6, Defense: 31.6, Form: 38.0

40.1

Attack: 42.9, Defense: 30.6, Form: 46.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
5

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

4

61-75'

2

76-90+'

4
Clyde
Forfar
Clyde

Power Rating Breakdown

41.2

Overall

Attack 50.6
Defense 31.6
Form 38.0
Consistency 44.8
Forfar

Power Rating Breakdown

40.1

Overall

Attack 42.9
Defense 30.6
Form 46.0
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

42.4 vs 38.5

Opponent Quality

46.6 vs 44.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Clyde logo Clyde
L
Dundee (59%)
W
Annan (29%)
L
Ross County (58%)
W
Airdrieonians (38%)
L
Hamilton (63%)
D
Hamilton (58%)
D
Spartans (42%)
W
Spartans (38%)
Forfar logo Forfar
W
Brechin (36%)
L
Livingston (53%)
L
Partick (54%)
L
Hamilton (63%)
L
Hamilton (58%)
D
Annan (29%)
W
Edinburgh City (36%)
W
Stranraer (37%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dundee A
0 - 4 L
59%
Annan H
4 - 1 W
29%
Ross County A
1 - 3 L
58%
Airdrieonians H
1 - 0 W
38%
Hamilton A
3 - 4 L
63%
Hamilton H
1 - 1 D
58%
Spartans A
1 - 1 D
42%
Spartans H
2 - 0 W
38%
East Kilbride A
0 - 5 L
57%
Annan H
3 - 1 W
24%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brechin H
3 - 1 W
36%
Livingston A
0 - 8 L
53%
Partick H
0 - 4 L
54%
Hamilton A
1 - 2 L
63%
Hamilton H
1 - 3 L
58%
Annan A
1 - 1 D
29%
Edinburgh City H
4 - 0 W
36%
Stranraer A
1 - 0 W
37%
East Kilbride H
1 - 0 W
52%
Elgin H
2 - 1 W
23%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.9 vs 41.9), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Clyde averaging 1.6 and Forfar averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Clyde conceding 2.0 and Forfar conceding 2.0 per match.

Clyde has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Forfar has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Clyde has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Forfar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Clyde's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Clyde

Clyde

VS
Forfar

Forfar

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Clyde

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 20 conceded

Forfar

5W 1D 4L · 14 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or