Skip to content
Compare QOTS vs Peterhead

QOTS vs Peterhead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare QOTS vs Peterhead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

QOTS QOTS Home Team
Peterhead Peterhead Away Team
QOTS
47.5
L L W D D D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Peterhead
34.9
D L W L L L D L L W

Performance Radar

QOTS
Peterhead

Categories Won

11

QOTS

3

Draw

1

Peterhead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Clark (7 goals)
N. McGinn (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4

45.3

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 49.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.66

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14

0.66

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
47.5

Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9

34.9

Attack: 25.4, Defense: 50.8, Form: 19.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

1

31-45'

1

46-60'

4
5

61-75'

2
7

76-90+'

2
QOTS
Peterhead
QOTS

Power Rating Breakdown

47.5

Overall

Attack 57.8
Defense 48.2
Form 28.9
Consistency 62.8
Peterhead

Power Rating Breakdown

34.9

Overall

Attack 25.4
Defense 50.8
Form 19.1
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 39.0

Opponent Quality

47.4 vs 49.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
QOTS logo QOTS
L
Queen's Park (54%)
L
Aberdeen (60%)
W
Brora Rangers (42%)
D
Kelty Hearts (45%)
D
Stenhousemuir (64%)
D
Stenhousemuir (59%)
W
Alloa Athletic (39%)
D
Montrose (38%)
Peterhead logo Peterhead
D
Kilmarnock (60%)
L
Raith Rovers (56%)
W
Elgin (34%)
L
Hamilton (58%)
L
Kelty Hearts (41%)
L
Hamilton (59%)
D
QOTS (45%)
L
Inverness (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Queen's Park A
1 - 3 L
54%
Aberdeen H
1 - 4 L
60%
Brora Rangers A
3 - 0 W
42%
Kelty Hearts H
1 - 1 D
45%
Stenhousemuir A
2 - 2 D
64%
Stenhousemuir H
1 - 1 D
59%
Alloa Athletic A
4 - 1 W
39%
Montrose H
2 - 2 D
38%
Peterhead A
1 - 1 D
37%
Cove Rangers H
2 - 0 W
36%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kilmarnock H
0 - 0 D
60%
Raith Rovers A
0 - 1 L
56%
Elgin A
3 - 1 W
34%
Hamilton H
0 - 1 L
58%
Kelty Hearts H
0 - 2 L
41%
Hamilton A
1 - 3 L
59%
QOTS H
1 - 1 D
45%
Inverness H
0 - 2 L
53%
East Fife A
1 - 2 L
50%
Alloa Athletic A
2 - 1 W
39%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.4 vs 45.3), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Few sides can match QOTS in front of goal. Their 1.8 average per fixture tells the story, with N. Clark driving that output personally responsible for 7 goals this campaign.

Defensively, QOTS and Peterhead are evenly matched, allowing 1.5 and 1.4 goals per game respectively.

QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Peterhead has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Peterhead is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, QOTS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Peterhead can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 12.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 82% win probability for QOTS. In practical terms, QOTS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

QOTS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.6-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Scottish League One (2026-04-18). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

QOTS

QOTS

VS
Peterhead

Peterhead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

QOTS

3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

Peterhead

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or