QOTS vs Peterhead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare QOTS vs Peterhead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
QOTS
Home Team
Peterhead
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
QOTS
Draw
Peterhead
Statistical Comparison
3W, 5D, 2L
2W, 2D, 6L
18 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
+3
-6
2 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4
League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 49.5
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.14
Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9
Attack: 25.4, Defense: 50.8, Form: 19.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
QOTS
Peterhead
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.4 vs 45.3), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Few sides can match QOTS in front of goal. Their 1.8 average per fixture tells the story, with N. Clark driving that output personally responsible for 7 goals this campaign.
Defensively, QOTS and Peterhead are evenly matched, allowing 1.5 and 1.4 goals per game respectively.
QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Peterhead has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Peterhead is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, QOTS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Peterhead can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 12.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 82% win probability for QOTS. In practical terms, QOTS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
QOTS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.6-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Scottish League One (2026-04-18). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
QOTS
Peterhead
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
QOTS
3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Peterhead
2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams