Clydebank vs Partick Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Clydebank vs Partick: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Clydebank
Home Team
Partick
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Clydebank
Draw
Partick
Statistical Comparison
7W, 2D, 1L
4W, 4D, 2L
30 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
+19
+11
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5W / 6 matches
2W / 3 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 29.0, Opponent Quality: 40.3
League Difficulty: 46.6, Opponent Quality: 51.9
0W / 0 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 3.0 | Diff: +0.51
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: +0.25
Attack: 85.8, Defense: 54.3, Form: 60.1
Attack: 55.0, Defense: 63.7, Form: 34.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Clydebank
Partick
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 35.8 vs 36.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Few sides can match Clydebank in front of goal. Their 3.0 average per fixture tells the story, with N. McLaughlin driving that output personally responsible for 7 goals this campaign.
Defensively, Partick holds the advantage — allowing just 0.8 goals per game against Clydebank's 1.1.
Clydebank has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Clydebank has an exceptional home record with a 83% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
🔥 Form Momentum: Clydebank is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 30 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
📈 Form Momentum: Partick has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Clydebank is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Partick shows signs of decline with 4W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 15.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Clydebank. In practical terms, Clydebank would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Clydebank holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 66.9 against 51.3 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
These two teams drew 2-2 in the Club Friendlies (2026-07-26). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Clydebank
Partick
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Clydebank
7W 2D 1L · 30 goals scored · 11 conceded
Partick
4W 4D 2L · 19 goals scored · 8 conceded
Popular Teams