Skip to content
Compare Larne vs Cliftonville

Larne vs Cliftonville Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Larne vs Cliftonville: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Larne Larne Home Team
Cliftonville Cliftonville Away Team
Larne
52.8
W D L D L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Cliftonville
59.7
L W W L W W W L W W

Performance Radar

Larne
Cliftonville

Categories Won

4

Larne

1

Draw

10

Cliftonville

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

70%

7W, 0D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Lusty (4 goals)
L. McStravick (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

71%

5W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
60.4

League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 67.4

46.1

League Difficulty: 43.2, Opponent Quality: 48.1

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.32

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.08

1.5

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
52.8

Attack: 51.5, Defense: 66.2, Form: 44.2

59.7

Attack: 51.3, Defense: 70.5, Form: 67.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

1
Larne
Cliftonville
Larne

Power Rating Breakdown

52.8

Overall

Attack 51.5
Defense 66.2
Form 44.2
Consistency 50.5
Cliftonville

Power Rating Breakdown

59.7

Overall

Attack 51.3
Defense 70.5
Form 67.3
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

76.5 vs 43.2

Opponent Quality

67.4 vs 48.1

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Larne logo Larne
W
Red Imps (59%)
D
Coleraine (59%)
L
Iberia (70%)
D
Iberia (67%)
L
Red Star (88%)
L
Red Star (83%)
W
Tre Fiori (68%)
W
Tre Fiori (70%)
Cliftonville logo Cliftonville
L
Linfield (53%)
W
Bangor (49%)
W
Crusaders (50%)
L
Alvechurch (48%)
W
Warrenpoint (42%)
W
Newington (40%)
W
Moyola Park (36%)
L
Dungannon (55%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Red Imps A
2 - 0 W
59%
Coleraine A
0 - 0 D
59%
Iberia A
1 - 2 L
70%
Iberia H
0 - 0 D
67%
Red Star A
0 - 5 L
88%
Red Star H
0 - 4 L
83%
Tre Fiori H
2 - 1 W
68%
Tre Fiori A
1 - 0 W
70%
Coleraine H
0 - 0 D
55%
Dungannon H
8 - 0 W
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Linfield A
0 - 1 L
53%
Bangor A
3 - 0 W
49%
Crusaders H
2 - 1 W
50%
Alvechurch H
1 - 2 L
48%
Warrenpoint H
2 - 1 W
42%
Newington H
1 - 0 W
40%
Moyola Park H
3 - 0 W
36%
Dungannon H
1 - 2 L
55%
Linfield A
2 - 1 W
53%
Dungannon H
1 - 0 W
55%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Context matters here: Larne's schedule strength (SoS: 60.4) has been notably more demanding than Cliftonville's (SoS: 46.1), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Larne averaging 1.4 and Cliftonville averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Cliftonville has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Larne's 1.2.

Larne has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Cliftonville has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cliftonville is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.5 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Larne has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

🔥 Form Momentum: Cliftonville is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 16 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Cliftonville is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Larne shows signs of decline with 4W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 67% win probability for Cliftonville. In practical terms, Cliftonville would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Cliftonville holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 6.9-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Larne

Larne

VS
Cliftonville

Cliftonville

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Larne

4W 3D 3L · 14 goals scored · 12 conceded

Cliftonville

7W 0D 3L · 16 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or