Larne vs Cliftonville Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Larne vs Cliftonville: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Larne
Home Team
Cliftonville
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Larne
Draw
Cliftonville
Statistical Comparison
4W, 3D, 3L
7W, 0D, 3L
14 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
+2
+8
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
5W / 7 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 67.4
League Difficulty: 43.2, Opponent Quality: 48.1
1W / 4 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.08
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1
Attack: 51.5, Defense: 66.2, Form: 44.2
Attack: 51.3, Defense: 70.5, Form: 67.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Larne
Cliftonville
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Context matters here: Larne's schedule strength (SoS: 60.4) has been notably more demanding than Cliftonville's (SoS: 46.1), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Larne averaging 1.4 and Cliftonville averaging 1.6 goals per match.
Cliftonville has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Larne's 1.2.
Larne has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Cliftonville has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Cliftonville is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.5 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Larne has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
🔥 Form Momentum: Cliftonville is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 16 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Cliftonville is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Larne shows signs of decline with 4W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 6.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 67% win probability for Cliftonville. In practical terms, Cliftonville would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
While Cliftonville holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 6.9-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Larne
Cliftonville
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Larne
4W 3D 3L · 14 goals scored · 12 conceded
Cliftonville
7W 0D 3L · 16 goals scored · 8 conceded
Popular Teams