Earthquakes vs Whitecaps Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Earthquakes vs Whitecaps: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Earthquakes
Home Team
Whitecaps
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Earthquakes
Draw
Whitecaps
Statistical Comparison
1W, 2D, 7L
4W, 3D, 3L
13 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
26 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
-13
+7
0 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
0W / 6 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 4 matches
3W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.8
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 54.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.1
Attack: 44.7, Defense: 13.7, Form: 10.3
Attack: 57.6, Defense: 54.6, Form: 36.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Earthquakes
Whitecaps
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
Earthquakes has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.1) compared to Whitecaps (SoS: 41.0). This means Earthquakes's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Offensively, Whitecaps outperforms Earthquakes with 1.9 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Whitecaps holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.2 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Earthquakes's leaky backline that surrenders 2.6 goals per match.
Earthquakes has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Earthquakes is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Whitecaps has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Whitecaps is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Earthquakes shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 18.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Whitecaps. In practical terms, Whitecaps would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Whitecaps in this contest. Their superior power rating of 49.4, compared to 31.1 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the US Major League Soccer (2026-05-10). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Earthquakes
Whitecaps
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Earthquakes
1W 2D 7L · 13 goals scored · 26 conceded
Whitecaps
4W 3D 3L · 19 goals scored · 12 conceded
Popular Teams