Skip to content
Compare Earthquakes vs Whitecaps

Earthquakes vs Whitecaps Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Earthquakes vs Whitecaps: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Earthquakes Earthquakes Home Team
Whitecaps Whitecaps Away Team
Earthquakes
31.1
L L L L D L W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Whitecaps
49.4
W L W D D L W L W D

Performance Radar

Earthquakes
Whitecaps

Categories Won

3

Earthquakes

3

Draw

9

Whitecaps

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 2D, 7L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.6

26 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-13

-13

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
P. Judd (4 goals)
B. White (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.8

41.0

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 54.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.26

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04

2.0

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
31.1

Attack: 44.7, Defense: 13.7, Form: 10.3

49.4

Attack: 57.6, Defense: 54.6, Form: 36.4

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

5

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

4
1

76-90+'

4
Earthquakes
Whitecaps
Earthquakes

Power Rating Breakdown

31.1

Overall

Attack 44.7
Defense 13.7
Form 10.3
Consistency 74.5
Whitecaps

Power Rating Breakdown

49.4

Overall

Attack 57.6
Defense 54.6
Form 36.4
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

51.8 vs 54.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Earthquakes logo Earthquakes
L
Minnesota (45%)
L
Galaxy (49%)
L
St. Louis (68%)
L
Cincinnati (61%)
D
Galaxy (44%)
L
Orlando (49%)
W
Portland (58%)
L
Dallas (53%)
Whitecaps logo Whitecaps
W
Dallas (53%)
L
Houston (65%)
W
Sounders (36%)
D
LAFC (53%)
D
Minnesota (50%)
L
Cincinnati (61%)
W
San Diego (59%)
L
Houston (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Minnesota H
1 - 5 L
45%
Galaxy A
0 - 1 L
49%
St. Louis H
1 - 3 L
68%
Cincinnati A
2 - 4 L
61%
Galaxy H
1 - 1 D
44%
Orlando H
0 - 4 L
49%
Portland A
3 - 1 W
58%
Dallas H
2 - 3 L
53%
Sounders A
2 - 3 L
36%
Whitecaps H
1 - 1 D
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dallas H
5 - 0 W
53%
Houston H
0 - 1 L
65%
Sounders A
2 - 0 W
36%
LAFC H
1 - 1 D
53%
Minnesota A
0 - 0 D
50%
Cincinnati A
3 - 4 L
61%
San Diego A
4 - 2 W
59%
Houston A
0 - 1 L
70%
Dallas A
3 - 2 W
58%
Earthquakes A
1 - 1 D
38%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

Earthquakes has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.1) compared to Whitecaps (SoS: 41.0). This means Earthquakes's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.

Offensively, Whitecaps outperforms Earthquakes with 1.9 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Whitecaps holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.2 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Earthquakes's leaky backline that surrenders 2.6 goals per match.

Earthquakes has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Earthquakes is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Whitecaps has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Whitecaps is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Earthquakes shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 18.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Whitecaps. In practical terms, Whitecaps would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Whitecaps in this contest. Their superior power rating of 49.4, compared to 31.1 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the US Major League Soccer (2026-05-10). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Earthquakes

Earthquakes

VS
Whitecaps

Whitecaps

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Earthquakes

1W 2D 7L · 13 goals scored · 26 conceded

Whitecaps

4W 3D 3L · 19 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or