TNS vs Penybont Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare TNS vs Penybont: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
TNS
Home Team
Penybont
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
TNS
Draw
Penybont
Statistical Comparison
5W, 0D, 5L
1W, 2D, 7L
12 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
0
-9
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
4W / 6 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 58.7, Opponent Quality: 60.4
League Difficulty: 51.6, Opponent Quality: 56.4
0W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06
Actual: 0.4 | Diff: +0.01
Attack: 37.8, Defense: 56.8, Form: 47.3
Attack: 12.1, Defense: 51.2, Form: 9.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
TNS
Penybont
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.6 vs 40.4), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, TNS outperforms Penybont with 1.2 goals per match to 0.4, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with TNS giving up 1.2 and Penybont giving up 1.3 per fixture.
TNS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
TNS is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Statistical modeling projects 2.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: TNS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Penybont is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. TNS is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Penybont shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 14.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for TNS. In practical terms, TNS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
TNS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
In their recent Cymru Premier match (2026-03-14), TNS prevailed 1-2 against Penybont. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, TNS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Penybont shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Penybont will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TNS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
TNS
Penybont
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
TNS
5W 0D 5L · 12 goals scored · 12 conceded
Penybont
1W 2D 7L · 4 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams