Clydebank vs Tranent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Clydebank vs Tranent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Clydebank
Home Team
Tranent
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Clydebank
Draw
Tranent
Statistical Comparison
8W, 0D, 2L
6W, 2D, 2L
34 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
+25
+10
6 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 3 matches
3W / 5 matches
5W / 7 matches
3W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.3
League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 39.5
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 3.4 | Diff: +0.82
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: +0.59
Attack: 84.8, Defense: 59.4, Form: 67.8
Attack: 53.0, Defense: 58.6, Form: 50.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Clydebank
Tranent
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 34.8 vs 33.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
Clydebank's attack is on another level, averaging 3.4 goals per match with N. McLaughlin leading the charge with 10 goals. Tranent manages just 1.9 per match.
Both defenses are comparable, with Clydebank conceding 0.9 and Tranent conceding 0.9 per match.
Clydebank has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Tranent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
The home advantage factor favors Clydebank, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.
Clydebank is a strong road team with a 71% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.
Clydebank emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (69.2 vs 53.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Clydebank
Tranent
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Clydebank
8W 0D 2L · 34 goals scored · 9 conceded
Tranent
6W 2D 2L · 19 goals scored · 9 conceded
Popular Teams