Clydebank vs Tranent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Clydebank vs Tranent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Clydebank
Home Team
Tranent
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Clydebank
Draw
Tranent
Statistical Comparison
7W, 2D, 1L
6W, 2D, 2L
30 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
+19
+10
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5W / 6 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
3W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 29.0, Opponent Quality: 40.3
League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 33.0
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 3.0 | Diff: +0.51
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.49
Attack: 85.8, Defense: 54.3, Form: 60.1
Attack: 45.2, Defense: 61.2, Form: 47.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Clydebank
Tranent
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 35.8 vs 29.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Clydebank's attack is on another level, averaging 3.0 goals per match with N. McLaughlin leading the charge (7 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
Tranent's backline outperforms Clydebank's, with 0.7 goals conceded per match versus 1.1.
Clydebank has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Tranent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Clydebank has an exceptional home record with a 83% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Tranent is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
🔥 Form Momentum: Clydebank is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 30 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
📈 Form Momentum: Tranent has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: Both teams are on upward trajectories. Clydebank has won 7 of their last 5, while Tranent has won 6. This clash of momentum makes the outcome particularly unpredictable.
💡 Why This Matters: The 15.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Clydebank. In practical terms, Clydebank would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Clydebank emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (66.9 vs 51.0) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Clydebank
Tranent
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Clydebank
7W 2D 1L · 30 goals scored · 11 conceded
Tranent
6W 2D 2L · 17 goals scored · 7 conceded
Popular Teams